From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B04C53858D33; Wed, 1 Mar 2023 16:12:59 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B04C53858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677687179; bh=KsDkt6/9j8+Eo0c7YArvex2pArEAUfI5pYeUGo1mhCA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c6/jON9E3oEiMdLBrq9DGuBp75IgfcN8eGXJSEUFPrF/g0uE8MnfpXYZci74H6Xdq 4HmetrXe4M1yHvOtifjhafknuZd3rTcxAW0B+QYPkSgXDsW01NSOw1YCBLa3tbF+Lu ktJ+tQzc7TAb0mMFNdC1ZDAJSbtksyS5DJZ9TF14= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/106259] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in diag_mismatched_tags, at cp/parser.cc:33896 Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2023 16:12:58 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106259 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I know, in principle, how to fix it, but currently I'm struggling with gett= ing struct A::W from struct A::W That we haven't found struct A::W in class2loc is actually OK, we d= on't have a A specialization, so we should see if W in the primary template= A was defined with class or struct.=