public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
@ 2022-07-12 12:06 chumarshal at foxmail dot com
2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-05 3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chumarshal at foxmail dot com @ 2022-07-12 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269
Bug ID: 106269
Summary: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++
spec
Product: gcc
Version: rust/master
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: chumarshal at foxmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
#include <iostream>
#include <cstddef>
void operator delete[]( void* ptr ) noexcept {
std::cout << "====delete with 1 parameters======" << std::endl;
::operator delete(ptr);
}
void operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t size ) noexcept {
std::cout << "====delete with 2 parameters======" << std::endl;
::operator delete(ptr);
}
int main()
{
int* p = new int[2];
p[0] = 1;
p[1] = 2;
delete[] p;
}
The result is:
====delete with 1 parameters======
But it does not follow c++14 spec as follow:
C++14 Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2014), Section 5.3.5, Paragraph 10:
"If the type is complete and if deallocation function lookup finds both a
usual deallocation function with only a pointer parameter and a usual
deallocation function with both a pointer parameter and a size parameter,
then the selected deallocation function shall be the one with two
parameters. Otherwise, the selected deallocation function shall be the
function with one parameter."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106269] the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
@ 2022-07-12 12:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-05 3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-12 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is the correct behaviour, see https://wg21.link/cwg1788 which changed the
standard.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/106269] the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-05 3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chumarshal at foxmail dot com @ 2022-09-05 3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269
--- Comment #2 from marshal <chumarshal at foxmail dot com> ---
(In reply to marshal from comment #0)
> #include <iostream>
> #include <cstddef>
>
> void operator delete[]( void* ptr ) noexcept {
> std::cout << "====delete with 1 parameters======" << std::endl;
> ::operator delete(ptr);
> }
>
> void operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t size ) noexcept {
>
> std::cout << "====delete with 2 parameters======" << std::endl;
> ::operator delete(ptr);
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> int* p = new int[2];
> p[0] = 1;
> p[1] = 2;
> delete[] p;
> }
>
>
> The result is:
> ====delete with 1 parameters======
>
>
> But it does not follow c++14 spec as follow:
>
> C++14 Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2014), Section 5.3.5, Paragraph 10:
> "If the type is complete and if deallocation function lookup finds both a
> usual deallocation function with only a pointer parameter and a usual
> deallocation function with both a pointer parameter and a size parameter,
> then the selected deallocation function shall be the one with two
> parameters. Otherwise, the selected deallocation function shall be the
> function with one parameter."
/*
* (c) Copyright 2017-2021 by Solid Sands B.V.,
* Amsterdam, the Netherlands. All rights reserved.
* Subject to conditions in the RESTRICTIONS file.
*/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-05 3:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-05 3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).