public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
@ 2022-07-12 12:06 chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-09-05  3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chumarshal at foxmail dot com @ 2022-07-12 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269

            Bug ID: 106269
           Summary: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++
                    spec
           Product: gcc
           Version: rust/master
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

#include <iostream> 
#include <cstddef>

void operator delete[]( void* ptr                   ) noexcept {
     std::cout << "====delete with 1 parameters======" << std::endl;
    ::operator delete(ptr);
}

void operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t size ) noexcept {

     std::cout << "====delete with 2 parameters======" << std::endl;
    ::operator delete(ptr);
}

int main()
{
    int* p = new int[2];
    p[0] = 1;
    p[1] = 2;
    delete[] p;
}


The result is:
====delete with 1 parameters======


But it does not follow c++14 spec as follow:

C++14 Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2014), Section 5.3.5, Paragraph 10:
"If the type is complete and if deallocation function lookup finds both a
usual deallocation function with only a pointer parameter and a usual
deallocation function with both a pointer parameter and a size parameter,
then the selected deallocation function shall be the one with two
parameters. Otherwise, the selected deallocation function shall be the
function with one parameter."

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/106269] the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
  2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
@ 2022-07-12 12:26 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  2022-09-05  3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-12 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is the correct behaviour, see https://wg21.link/cwg1788 which changed the
standard.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/106269] the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec
  2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-09-05  3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: chumarshal at foxmail dot com @ 2022-09-05  3:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106269

--- Comment #2 from marshal <chumarshal at foxmail dot com> ---
(In reply to marshal from comment #0)
> #include <iostream> 
> #include <cstddef>
> 
> void operator delete[]( void* ptr                   ) noexcept {
>      std::cout << "====delete with 1 parameters======" << std::endl;
>     ::operator delete(ptr);
> }
> 
> void operator delete[]( void* ptr, std::size_t size ) noexcept {
> 
>      std::cout << "====delete with 2 parameters======" << std::endl;
>     ::operator delete(ptr);
> }
> 
> int main()
> {
>     int* p = new int[2];
>     p[0] = 1;
>     p[1] = 2;
>     delete[] p;
> }
> 
> 
> The result is:
> ====delete with 1 parameters======
> 
> 
> But it does not follow c++14 spec as follow:
> 
> C++14 Standard (ISO/IEC 14882:2014), Section 5.3.5, Paragraph 10:
> "If the type is complete and if deallocation function lookup finds both a
> usual deallocation function with only a pointer parameter and a usual
> deallocation function with both a pointer parameter and a size parameter,
> then the selected deallocation function shall be the one with two
> parameters. Otherwise, the selected deallocation function shall be the
> function with one parameter."


/*
 * (c) Copyright 2017-2021 by Solid Sands B.V.,
 *     Amsterdam, the Netherlands. All rights reserved.
 *     Subject to conditions in the RESTRICTIONS file.
 */

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-05  3:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-07-12 12:06 [Bug c++/106269] New: the "operator delete" selection does not follow c++ spec chumarshal at foxmail dot com
2022-07-12 12:26 ` [Bug c++/106269] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-05  3:30 ` chumarshal at foxmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).