From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 508F23858439; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 13:01:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 508F23858439 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1662037305; bh=eZWdtSufzOLgdSgevNfSgyMbjP22XwYMdy/81ayp1tI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=A2qQqlfozhiSKgxaJ2VugD+HS1d8SvqNv7hjlhxVWtMWuFeLQA1JQQ4XAw48Hqhzm 6GzzAgH+F9s/VDsOqXbrgK3kYtP43td6ShjQ+xlq1ySTYeap9NTofOOaNSrTm0rtJX udfAiCucGCRi4PlmTUpmwuP/Dt2aPWvk5c8MVPBU= From: "rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106279] reload problem on arm iwmmxt Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:01:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106279 Richard Earnshaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-01 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw --- In a general cross compiler you need: -march=3Diwmmxt -mfpu=3Dvfp -mfloat-a= bi=3Dhard to reproduce. This seems to need a combination of VFP, iWMMX and the hard-float ABI. I d= on't think we've ever claimed to support this. Whilst there may be a few devices with both iWMMX and VFP present, I think that's mostly for backwards compatibility. So I think we should resolve this as WONTFIX, but it would be nice if the compiler could reject this upfront rather than ICEing later on.=