From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9774C3858C39; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:11:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9774C3858C39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1681744309;
	bh=1Eq/g7P2b1W5yybZG2ggVSgSEbxWLL0bRlK5psAsHYI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=eSl8hkNoCDldo/7VIcOAQFTfsdnIAwT4SfJKfO7rFNn23Ke8W71TNFDB2l57ZnMU8
	 QYlnJ0cYYDvbeUG08bpMyATeOeau2a4n/6Ox2xlWxzB8EPERtIyj4OEQ1Qk2HinN5z
	 /GtXOIH/oeJnauK/rgrGGUnCwFqzZ8U0id1B53i8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106293] [13/14 Regression] 456.hmmer at
 -Ofast -march=native regressed by 19% on zen2 and zen3 in July 2022
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:11:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106293-4-VWDRS9f20x@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106293-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106293

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, what is left in tHIS PR?  Shall we retarget it for GCC 14?=