public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106308] New: Consider using statx(2) for std::filesystem Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:25:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106308 Bug ID: 106308 Summary: Consider using statx(2) for std::filesystem Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: *-*-linux* We don't need all the info that stat(2) provides. Whenever we want to create a filesystem::file_status we only need st_mode. This would speed up many operations that use filesystem::file_status or filesystem::file_type. filesystem::file_size only uses st_mode and st_size filesystem::read_symlink only uses st_mode and st_size filesystem::copy and filesystem::copy_file only use st_mode, st_dev, st_ino, and st_size. filesystem::equivalent only uses st_mode, st_dev, st_ino. filesystem::last_write_time only uses st_mtim. We never care about atim, ctim, uid, nlink, rdev, blocks, or blksize (although maybe we should use blksize for filesystem::copy_file). Fetching those fields for files on remote filesystems is wasteful.
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 21:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-14 21:25 redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-01-06 2:08 ` [Bug libstdc++/106308] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-01-11 9:12 ` kmatsui at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).