public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106308] New: Consider using statx(2) for std::filesystem
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:25:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106308

            Bug ID: 106308
           Summary: Consider using statx(2) for std::filesystem
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
            Target: *-*-linux*

We don't need all the info that stat(2) provides.


Whenever we want to create a filesystem::file_status we only need st_mode. This
would speed up many operations that use filesystem::file_status or
filesystem::file_type.

filesystem::file_size only uses st_mode and st_size

filesystem::read_symlink only uses st_mode and st_size

filesystem::copy and filesystem::copy_file only use st_mode, st_dev, st_ino,
and st_size.

filesystem::equivalent only uses st_mode, st_dev, st_ino.

filesystem::last_write_time only uses st_mtim.


We never care about atim, ctim, uid, nlink, rdev, blocks, or blksize (although
maybe we should use blksize for filesystem::copy_file). Fetching those fields
for files on remote filesystems is wasteful.

             reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-14 21:25 redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-01-06  2:08 ` [Bug libstdc++/106308] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-01-11  9:12 ` kmatsui at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).