From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3CA4D3857B98; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:11:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3CA4D3857B98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1694470270;
	bh=mJ74jCm7PKIMLoPVv3OZtXOnIuttkkrPCF5S1HwlSsE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TMQFjcSHWjCdcqSy6nOrrmopOchgYWwJ6+saSdeFY0dLmsqhl8gJW8bOhAZFF6RLi
	 q9fSbaRimbBm9ZpW8WtXEiTKilEO9DXD/ItB7KdZGMI8+5hKGOrpkkwqfv3M/aNzu3
	 SmEi4EEJz0PQZgdU0b1npXDAMkr6f7lrktw1MIFc=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106310] [11 Regression] lookup after this-> seems wrong for
 dependent lookup since r12-6754-g30f2c22def739211
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 22:11:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106310-4-0p6oXQxDIn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106310-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106310-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106310

--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:506d5f399bef7f2d8c48fd83d853c6ff7811a226

commit r11-10983-g506d5f399bef7f2d8c48fd83d853c6ff7811a226
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 26 10:39:34 2023 -0400

    c++: member vs global template [PR106310]

    For backward compatibility we still want to allow patterns like
    this->A<T>::foo, but the template keyword in a qualified name is
    specifically to specify that a dependent name is a template, so don't l=
ook
    in the enclosing scope at all.

    Also fix handling of dependent bases: if member lookup in the current
    instantiation fails and we have dependent bases, the lookup is dependen=
t.
    We were already handling that for the case where lookup in the enclosing
    scope also fails, but we also want it to affect that lookup itself.

            PR c++/106310

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * parser.c (cp_parser_template_name): Skip non-member
            lookup after the template keyword.
            (cp_parser_lookup_name): Pass down template_keyword_p.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/template/template-keyword4.C: New test.=