From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id A1285385B53C; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:22:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1285385B53C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1691788924;
	bh=A1GIC3dBP591zucoNalhm0MkUC+UW5O+7kVbnpDpkng=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=U+Qd6wJay7sgEEYFDGJ0EplUwAMxtmHnrDd/QGfwBQx4JagSR6PGsCaPkQxzCrsyB
	 J4EcT8tbKjslJydWbW1WTYrH/+ESSaOQF537PahrWIzLoe/9vlj1uBtbujSlkwi0ce
	 uij5Z5UlczRCltEOQ22LRipvoi3x7ylAZ+xJrp+A=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106310] [12/13 Regression] lookup after this-> seems wrong
 for dependent lookup since r12-6754-g30f2c22def739211
Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2023 21:22:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106310-4-IFWVQf1AnS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106310-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106310-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106310

--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
<jason@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:db6c4ba976a795480cbccc380e3a84eec1de8e68

commit r13-7712-gdb6c4ba976a795480cbccc380e3a84eec1de8e68
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 26 10:39:34 2023 -0400

    c++: member vs global template [PR106310]

    For backward compatibility we still want to allow patterns like
    this->A<T>::foo, but the template keyword in a qualified name is
    specifically to specify that a dependent name is a template, so don't l=
ook
    in the enclosing scope at all.

    Also fix handling of dependent bases: if member lookup in the current
    instantiation fails and we have dependent bases, the lookup is dependen=
t.
    We were already handling that for the case where lookup in the enclosing
    scope also fails, but we also want it to affect that lookup itself.

            PR c++/106310

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * parser.cc (cp_parser_template_name): Skip non-member
            lookup after the template keyword.
            (cp_parser_lookup_name): Pass down template_keyword_p.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/template/template-keyword4.C: New test.=