From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E30B93858023; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:26:32 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E30B93858023
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664346392;
	bh=WBD0q0oEn/trH0jVdPIgH9Z9Pe9StqPKhxpnG9rJTd0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BARcpSii8TdZg6JffzEyMJWCSIEFFxAfxcI36IaxDKLioU9PuItC0Fee7RlmFKx4F
	 2kbmC08Z2n4p6vDgUeF4P5olDRQaNYAecOQvseXBpOr220uWPKF7+BtgdoQJjo8lMl
	 M9duAr1v332+WGa9GrZLgpxuJEmkQjLAiQlchkXY=
From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106322] [12 Regression] tree-vectorize: Wrong
 code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working) since
 r12-2404-ga1d27560770818c5
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 06:26:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106322-4-igSk2505bz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106322

--- Comment #54 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mathieu Malaterre from comment #53)
> Closing. I do not believe that Debian gcc-12 (12.2.0-3) really is an upda=
te
> to git 20220920 from the gcc-12 branch. Sorry for the noise.

OK. Thanks for the update! FWIW, with the reduced test case in comment #45,=
 I
just tried with releases/gcc-12 r12-8709 (without my fix), the aborting was
reproduced; while with r12-8710 (my fix), it executed well.=