From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6BBA8385AC19; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:51:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6BBA8385AC19
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661323895;
	bh=JShHGj+N/2Ni3WZyO1d6+/Mh1Is70JhSzMTkSvUGlZk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PNsC2graf+Is0auaHz3PVgrBOadJPboTjjJia4KaHqURd9BW2lNDeb3a30Hlx0LgE
	 89JBB9Kd4ZIJvA/r9Zb0ViRCLKiqx24Bn/yOhraL4QxtIJGlYO1Fk8vKbOuFxiXbJb
	 +nH3z4GZxbxPYFwHCslFmD7oFRw5f0wbEWoFLd+M=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106322] [12 Regression] tree-vectorize: Wrong
 code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working) since
 r12-2404-ga1d27560770818c5
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:51:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution cf_known_to_work bug_status
 cf_known_to_fail
Message-ID: <bug-106322-4-lNzPSXziJO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106322

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
      Known to work|                            |12.2.1
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
      Known to fail|                            |12.2.0

--- Comment #50 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #49)
> Hi Richi,
>=20
> One thing I'm not sure about is that if we want to backport this to gcc-11
> and gcc-10? Although the failure got exposed by .MULH pattern recog which=
 is
> only in gcc-12, IMHO the underlying issue exists in gcc-10 and gcc-11.

It's enough to backport to 12.=