public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "malat at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/106322] New: i386: Wrong code at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:48:21 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322 Bug ID: 106322 Summary: i386: Wrong code at O2 level (O0 / O1 are working) Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: malat at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- I can trigger an assertion in highway unit test suite on i386 when using -O2, which does not happen neither at -O1 nor at -O0. Symptoms: % ./tests/mul_test "--gtest_filter=HwyMulTestGroup/HwyMulTest.TestAllMulHigh/Emu128" Running main() from ./googletest/src/gtest_main.cc Note: Google Test filter = HwyMulTestGroup/HwyMulTest.TestAllMulHigh/Emu128 [==========] Running 1 test from 1 test suite. [----------] Global test environment set-up. [----------] 1 test from HwyMulTestGroup/HwyMulTest [ RUN ] HwyMulTestGroup/HwyMulTest.TestAllMulHigh/Emu128 i16x8 expect [0+ ->]: 0x3FFF,0x0FFF,0x03FF,0x00FF,0x003F,0x000F,0x0003, i16x8 actual [0+ ->]: 0xBFFF,0x0FFF,0xE400,0x00FF,0xF840,0x000F,0xFE04, Abort at ./hwy/tests/mul_test.cc:131: Emu128, i16x8 lane 0 mismatch: expected '0x3FFF', got '0xBFFF'.
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-16 9:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-16 9:48 malat at debian dot org [this message] 2022-07-16 9:55 ` [Bug c++/106322] " malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:00 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:00 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:02 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:02 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:07 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-16 10:15 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-17 20:20 ` [Bug target/106322] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-18 8:48 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-18 14:40 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-07-19 7:58 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2022-08-03 8:41 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-03 12:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106322] 32bits / tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working) malat at debian dot org 2022-08-03 12:32 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-03 12:33 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-05 13:14 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106322] " malat at debian dot org 2022-08-08 7:12 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-08 7:20 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-08 10:00 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 7:50 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 12:36 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 12:58 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2022-08-09 13:03 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:04 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:05 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:11 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106322] [12/13 Regression] tree-vectorize: Wrong code at O2 level (-fno-tree-vectorize is working) since r12-2404-ga1d27560770818c5 marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:12 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:26 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:29 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:30 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:34 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:40 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 13:53 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 13:56 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 14:01 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-08-09 15:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 5:25 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 5:34 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 6:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 6:24 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 9:47 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 12:32 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-10 12:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-11 1:18 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-15 6:51 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-16 5:50 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 2:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106322] [12 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 2:53 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 14:14 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-09-27 14:18 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-09-28 6:11 ` malat at debian dot org 2022-09-28 6:26 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106322-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).