public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/106383] False positives from -Wanalyzer-va-list-exhausted
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:30:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106383-4-wrRDL2eDWD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106383-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106383

--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm <dmalcolm@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b852aa7f265424c8e2036899da5d8306ff06a16c

commit r13-1786-gb852aa7f265424c8e2036899da5d8306ff06a16c
Author: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Jul 21 17:29:26 2022 -0400

    analyzer: fix -Wanalyzer-va-list-exhausted false +ve on va_arg in
subroutine [PR106383]

    gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog:
            PR analyzer/106383
            * varargs.cc (region_model::impl_call_va_arg): When determining if
            we're doing interprocedural analysis, use the stack depth of the
            frame in which va_start was called, rather than the current stack
            depth.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
            PR analyzer/106383
            * gcc.dg/analyzer/stdarg-3.c: New test.

    Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-21 14:38 [Bug analyzer/106383] New: " dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-21 18:14 ` [Bug analyzer/106383] " dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-21 21:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-07-21 21:34 ` dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106383-4-wrRDL2eDWD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).