From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8DAB13835839; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:19:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8DAB13835839 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/106399] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Wrong debug info for function with nested function under O0 Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:19:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_fail cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc target_milestone everconfirmed cf_known_to_work keywords priority bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:19:34 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106399 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |10.4.0, 11.3.0, 12.1.0, | |9.5.0 Last reconfirmed| |2022-07-22 Summary|Wrong debug info for |[10/11/12/13 Regression] |function with nested |Wrong debug info for |function under O0 |function with nested | |function under O0 Target Milestone|--- |10.5 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Known to work| |7.5.0, 8.4.0 Keywords| |needs-bisection, | |wrong-debug Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Confirmed. It works with -O -fno-inline, it also worked at some point.=