public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106415] loop-ivopts prevents correct usage of dbra with 16-bit loop counters on m68k Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 05:01:51 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106415-4-MPZL9d2QZ9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-106415-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106415 --- Comment #4 from Undefined Opcode <undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com> --- As an experiment, I added the following logic to m68k_rtx_costs(): case PLUS: // <omitted a few lines related to LEA> if(TUNE_68000_10 && !(mode == QImode || mode == HImode)) { *total = 400; // make non-byte/word ADD outrageously expensive return true; } Sure enough, the costs for all non-short IV shot up. However, it's still choosing candidate 7, same as before: <Candidate Costs>: cand cost force_expr_to_var_cost size costs: integer 2 symbol 4 address 4 other 16 force_expr_to_var_cost speed costs: integer 2 symbol 4 address 4 other 16 0 401 1 5 2 5 3 4 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 401 8 401 Later, when we get to group costs, the results aren't what I'd expect: <Group-candidate Costs>: Group 0: cand cost compl. inv.expr. inv.vars 0 400 0 NIL; NIL; 7 0 0 NIL; NIL; 8 400 0 NIL; NIL; Group 1: cand cost compl. inv.expr. inv.vars 0 0 0 NIL; NIL; 1 0 0 NIL; NIL; 2 0 0 NIL; NIL; 3 0 0 NIL; NIL; 4 0 0 NIL; NIL; 5 0 0 NIL; NIL; 6 -1 0 NIL; NIL; 7 0 0 NIL; NIL; 8 0 0 NIL; NIL; I'm not entirely sure what's going on here. Why does candidate 7 suddenly cost 0?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-26 5:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-07-22 17:32 [Bug tree-optimization/106415] New: " undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com 2022-07-22 18:50 ` [Bug tree-optimization/106415] " undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com 2022-07-25 16:51 ` [Bug target/106415] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-25 17:27 ` undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com 2022-07-26 5:01 ` undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com [this message] 2022-07-26 5:59 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-07-27 18:28 ` undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com 2022-08-01 23:44 ` undefinedopcode2 at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106415-4-MPZL9d2QZ9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).