From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 7AD0E3841455; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:46:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7AD0E3841455
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106433] [13 Regression] ICE in
 vect_transform_loops, at tree-vectorizer.cc:1032
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:46:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc cf_reconfirmed_on keywords target_milestone
 bug_status everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-106433-4-GYvwJ0pO72@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106433-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106433-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:46:21 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106433

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-07-25
           Keywords|                            |openmp
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.  It looks like bar.simdclone.0 () is not pure but bar () was pur=
e,
so sth is amiss in the simd cloning pass here?  We have

vector(2) int foo.simdclone.0 ()
{
...
  # VUSE <.MEM_7>
  _1 =3D bar (0);

but at IPA we don't yet know bar() is pure (its IL writes to memory).  Like=
ly
late local pure/cost discovery fixes that up and affects foo.simdclone.0 but
the simdclone decl for bar() is created earlier (but not adjusted?).  Should
local-pure-const also affect aliases/clones (are the simdclone clones even
visible properly to do this?).

I guess simply adjusting the simdclone decl from the vectorizer when detect=
ing
the mismatch in virtual operands is too ugly.

vector(2) int foo.simdclone.0 ()
{
...
  # .MEM =3D VDEF <.MEM_7>
  vect__1.39_12 =3D bar.simdclone.0 (vect_cst__11);=