From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 48A9C3858D33; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 06:34:13 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 48A9C3858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1694327653; bh=vuJrpkh+DSndBlr0zUSqIVh8OKNBe+BQJpBhJHS/XAs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f0A/yNI84Herr+OoBhSzuFt3lIvmsffcYAfw3lXkqnt+tC2mtW27gn7RnNioVoJoz G3b9XJ5UCCX4kiZW+K2RoY7U4UZNtMkA0XAL/OBAHrRFINji6lvOfFu2rj6eNre/xd hFFk1/G05Ek8ohp9Wd6c/2Jx8vumZwo/ogmbRrcM= From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'. Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 06:34:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106472 --- Comment #30 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to matoro from comment #26) > We also had somebody report on IRC that they observed this on powerpc (not > sure what tuple), again with -j1. It does not seem to show up with -j2, = so > likely -j1 is necessary to trigger. I can also confirm that switching to -j2 makes this particular error go awa= y=