From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7D0FB383A0D9; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 01:51:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7D0FB383A0D9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670723475;
	bh=RVnp5RwyDL/KCbzl5ry8jrzIXDwnAstZ3PabAoMi7z4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kWVTzZi47SYHuA5hQA/6z3IMkaM6ppIHWp2mv8j2alnKQj3taJ2j5+Ex4Py7CdZW4
	 yXbCuDLlkQGHwfI3QJiz3PMiB5RxREiilX/AOkMHGsMH8X9Kgp4yU4dqJJrne0Tph2
	 yOmfWfQ85B3D76Q6mxtwMHj9yXHTJrTFhbfS6b+Y=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106508] Extra warnings with lambda captures
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 01:51:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106508-4-uYQ4I8vHn5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106508-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106508

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first case you use default capturing as reference, therefor this will be
captured just fine.

The second case is similar to:
struct f1{int *a;};
struct f1 f(int t)
{
    struct f1 t1 =3D {&t};
    return t1;
}
Which I thought we warned about but it looks like I was wrong.=