From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8813638582A1; Tue,  7 Nov 2023 19:18:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8813638582A1
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1699384688;
	bh=//qKOdLXkEWv2vElv4pal9bBAQYE50hqarnjTlDNBKU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=s5q9lLLVhcWisVjK2wYuphuSxcfHXk97x3frW/cR5DKNsFHR2oIcMBojIAd4Lgmiu
	 OltGG7YjTIULLIhjgPPkifQOpw6OcBhnvdpPB7bzebJ8yLN9NLLLGFPh64hoY3AD0T
	 WQta1JwTYuR4gc0caaKrpt9Pr7/OlSTrQfiLZp2c=
From: "amacleod at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106511] [13/14 Regression] New
 -Werror=maybe-uninitialized since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2023 19:18:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: amacleod at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106511-4-JGpsDIsaWP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106511-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106511

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> VRP could use max_stmt_executions here (note it doesn't properly handle l=
oop
> nests so the name is somewhat misleading)

Do you have to ask for max_stmt_executions on each loop nest for the stmt to
get the real total?  and multiple them all together?  or can you only count=
 on
loop_outer()?=