From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ABBA13858C62; Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:27:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ABBA13858C62
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1673872068;
	bh=9V+//XVw7h9w8qykUCf3JfsDD6/vdFHuXxeRKnmzEZc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Hsemj1CP/zM6rQo5ao02bKkW/IE6YAWN7m2y6kd5YF99+NsB3knVu+P+ofPPOWC2S
	 CGNa2isoQrEs5zY3WSwb3dekMXIZ+uSGKKeCRI5j3Ed/ZUPfIoCcv83hEb/Ou4vzAo
	 n8nbW6Sflx5sGRQupC+QjiGcHgaakftZwQ4ZID6s=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106523] [10/11/12/13 Regression] forwprop
 miscompile
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 12:27:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cc
Message-ID: <bug-106523-4-ntm4v7HvSy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106523-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106523

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needs-bisection             |
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started most likely with my r0-123331-gcb3b8d33faa3a649b0282 (r0-123327 was=
 ok,
r0-123331 is bad and the only one that is about rotates).=