From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BA9213858296; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 19:02:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BA9213858296 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1686164528; bh=Wf1HkUXFIopeaIevs0AbiSkB02inKO9uW1j7NZBJzHk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hjbsynr0hTZZmjegap9SwKgxJz2o6EQEm4MYqpgRWIhOsB4XQNzbrVmQaQNKW9eV1 M5IWxuoEuaWksUTWJnq/Rqf0E/uOiwa3bS+K134AETcsr54xalTH+6TTiDww3vnC4n wSFtl09C90fxqPbgmyDswFKGgwVBSmHsGyevn2eg= From: "dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106562] PRU: Inefficient code for zero check of 64-bit (boolean) AND result Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2023 19:02:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106562 --- Comment #4 from Dimitar Dimitrov --- The ideal PRU code sequence for the snippet would be: char test(uint64_t a, uint64_t b) { return a && b; } or r14, r14, r15 or r16, r16, r17 umin r14, r14, 1 umin r14, r14, r16 ret Thus I'm trying to implementing the following conversion in emit_store_flag_int(): "X !=3D 0" -> "UMIN (X, 1)=