public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/106565] New: Using a transposed matrix in matmul (GCC-10.3.0) is very slow Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 20:04:23 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106565 Bug ID: 106565 Summary: Using a transposed matrix in matmul (GCC-10.3.0) is very slow Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov Target Milestone: --- gcc version 10.3.0 (GCC) linux Using (2) BB = transpose(B) C = matmul(A, BB) is 5 times faster than using (1) C = matmul(A, transpose(B)) ifort 19 doesn't have the problem. PROGRAM test_matrixCal ! ------------------------------------------------------ ! This code test ! (1) C = matmul(A, transpose(B)) ! against ! (2) BB = transpose(B) ! C = matmul(A, BB) ! (2) is 5 times faster than (1) ! gfortran -O3 test_matrixCal ! time a.ot ! ------------------------------------------------------ INTEGER, PARAMETER :: m = 200, n = 300, nn = 150 REAL :: A(m,n), B(nn,n), C(m,nn), BB(n,nn) INTEGER :: i, j, k, L A(:,:) = 3.0 B(:,:) = 1.7 iterative_loop: DO L = 1, 1000 A(:,10) = A(:,10) + 0.0001*L ! C = matmul(A, transpose(B)) BB = transpose(B) C = matmul(A, BB) IF(mod(L,50) == 0) print *,L, C(10,20) END DO iterative_loop STOP END PROGRAM test_matrixCal
next reply other threads:[~2022-08-08 20:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-08 20:04 quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov [this message] 2022-08-09 7:50 ` [Bug fortran/106565] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 14:01 ` quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov 2022-08-09 15:07 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 15:08 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-09 17:14 ` quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov 2022-08-09 17:17 ` quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov 2022-08-09 17:51 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2022-08-09 17:53 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2022-08-09 17:55 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2022-08-09 18:20 ` quanhua.liu at noaa dot gov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106565-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).