From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 464C43856DD6; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:29:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 464C43856DD6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663100957;
	bh=KTtBW6MxsQdhZIBCYxkPySNOMjdTZbLgqIwJchT0+54=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ar46oV7RE8NaVAQ7WHWj7Y2T7u767+lVX9MIXba+bfYgliwfmaRYX5/KgT7WF8g1k
	 AlxWlsXyrm8k94woagCNz6taSMSyNtBxRzvpioWjx0TifPEKknGlf2U26OYsC6otGC
	 CaH3wO8La21dUgOgy6zG7UutBySGNIYRK5wsS1qA=
From: "ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106567] [13 Regression] An array with a dependent type and
 initializer-deduced bound is treated as an array of unknown bound when
 captured in a lambda
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 20:29:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106567-4-CsyHmqhuWd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106567-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106567

--- Comment #7 from Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com> =
---
Since this is a 13 regression, we can close this, right? There's no backpor=
ts
needed.=