public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "noloader at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/106568] -freorder-blocks-algorithm appears to causes a crash in stable code, no way to disable it
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 21:52:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106568-4-N2h4JPiFN0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106568-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106568

--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey Walton <noloader at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Though there might be an EH issue but there has not been an EH issue for a
> long time .

This is an interesting observation.

The stack trace shows frame #0 is in pthread_kill_thread (or similar). But up
in our program, around frame #4 or #5, gdb is identifying the line with a catch
(CryptoPP::Exception& ). CryptoPP::Exception is the library's base class
exception, so it should catch everything the library throws.

This is the line gdb faults
(https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp/blob/master/test.cpp#L442) :

    catch(const Exception &e)  // 442
    {
        std::cout << "\nException caught: " << e.what() << std::endl;
        return -1;
    }

which makes no sense to me.

And the program does not take the exception path. Instead it segfaults.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-08 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-08 21:20 [Bug c++/106568] New: " noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-08 21:30 ` [Bug middle-end/106568] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 21:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 21:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/106568] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 21:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 21:52 ` noloader at gmail dot com [this message]
2022-08-08 22:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 22:18 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-08 22:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 23:05 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-08 23:20 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-08 23:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-08 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-09  0:56 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  1:09 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  1:35 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  1:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-09  1:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-09  2:05 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  4:22 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  4:22 ` noloader at gmail dot com
2022-08-09  7:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 20:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 20:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 21:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-02-06 22:21 ` [Bug ipa/106568] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106568-4-N2h4JPiFN0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).