From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D710A384406B; Sun,  4 Dec 2022 17:27:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D710A384406B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1670174863;
	bh=pNtKCBxWbXqMgjp/EqFPOKE4YbPLdBPbAgeHeVXS4KM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=BgR1QjFzFoozJS/ISOGge521atCniBVf4RyYDfVz/iahE5PAxfstCDJR2oNnRC1WG
	 K8/d6/rhdmfBOcQcjU8zC+TJidNeRPN96LwBuFlH7gNEgU5beYhKbDe44LMpWFE7c6
	 voEZqq0TD3Jyp4f3SuCNi1CFJ9ECn9ZT3/oDab30=
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/106576] Finalization of temporaries from functions not
 occuring
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 17:27:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106576-4-yyH2VdPgih@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106576-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106576

--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---

> I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause?

Hi Paul,

yes, I'm well, and the lack of time is indeed for a good cause :-)

> I have just returned to my finalizer patch. With it applied, your testcase
> produces the same output as NAG.

That's great!

> I will attach the present version of the patch to this PR.

Is there a chance that we will see this patch in gcc13?  Even if it
does not fix every last bug in finalizers in gfortran, it would still
be a very large improvement compared to the current condition.=