From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DE74B3858D32; Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:30:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DE74B3858D32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1678699807; bh=tUalnw36PWj9uqftQy1e8YolN6i3meTiGl7n1FLOkzg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sDuxXBfz3v5zTLoAS1/yEh+e2DKEkvHbfK4itbla/nBhvkB03sPG7UXHkDtc4hNBk mplUpJeAjvVcMGELUOtUWxnIJ67GiXYeqTabjZ8O9LkY5LMV1X6biAfEG7YuyGnsIR jYCuJv9oEWjJCOn7MvBqD3m6VdViCzMFxsUM2QRk= From: "roger at nextmovesoftware dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/106594] [13 Regression] sign-extensions no longer merged into addressing mode Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 09:30:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106594 Roger Sayle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D100378 --- Comment #22 from Roger Sayle --- This issue is related to PR 100378, which is another combine-related regression. In fact, PR 100378 is resolved by the (now disapproved) patch in comment #8. Presumably a variant of Richard Sandiford's make_compound_operation fix sho= uld be able to handle PR100378 too. Resolving multiple (long-standing) regress= ions really should be suitable for stage 4.=