From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6CF2B3858C50; Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:03:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6CF2B3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1677492188;
	bh=SuCLXExB6wHaQM+cvaXqioMhUqEHIdP22B127QhFB8w=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UiJn6kRhuLUCljJBQGUjc3uYVdRpFgOnV0AdE6a2lPJAwJfMo2WSCOVI4spDAymNX
	 l9+eZjunWiUBT/nMOebKZig8Blvwd2EK3i04vlkvxCG/K0a37KLgdh0vddc89gp35F
	 9vaZrEKzWU3Kjvje3nl62ZAZy2dyP8M9HqQo84Gc=
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/106594] [13 Regression] sign-extensions no
 longer merged into addressing mode
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 10:03:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106594-4-pQhrUHN54u@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106594-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106594

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #11)
> This patch seems to have stalled. CC'ing the maintainers as this is still=
 a
> large regression for us.

Roger's latest updated patch was posted recently at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/612840.html=