From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 855453857023; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 15:11:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 855453857023 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1667401899; bh=ExE/yaPKn+/2YZBfekwp0U3WFNWonyZ0Ef3QsIfOGEM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v1eW/WfdKTkikYBL0POq4Dq3uMKBHEjMBGPPBrOn0WseP++JmvJ5J74c/YrhagQwp lhVEGp544HIP4u/R70JxYEXoFo6UFUNxqbc5u5/kwbzRMV/jZxvFnzNpbkXPGMHjCn 2Xxr6Jv/IqEkMkri7ySYSF7QWpiom5Y0g7qgtoFc= From: "law at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 15:11:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: law at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106602 --- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Vineet: I don't know your priorities and such, but I've got a junior engine= er starting in a bit under two weeks and this would actually be a good issue f= or them to tackle as part of learning about GCC. So if you want to set it asi= de, I can have someone poking at it fairly soon.=