From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0150238582A6; Wed, 2 Nov 2022 17:02:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0150238582A6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1667408557; bh=A39yFohol4u28EyTd6AES+qAa16jVO/ns7MC8VhyBUg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=T3r/Lr04yoUIbr6PSo82fOjekg5T6LMgOQH5trlUejBkCgwI80EEQUy+uMrRNRDCY N9aF9iUfE2DTFnytU347f+uDc492GlRxllSgW0ceV5pug1n4OYWg9fWudDrNNX5SHe x3sIH+HDkuDQ6n0JEEeIb7Eaok6nicIrg6zZcADo= From: "vineetg at rivosinc dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106602] riscv: suboptimal codegen for zero_extendsidi2_shifted w/o bitmanip Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2022 17:02:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: vineetg at rivosinc dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106602 --- Comment #18 from Vineet Gupta --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #17) > Vineet: I don't know your priorities and such, but I've got a junior > engineer starting in a bit under two weeks and this would actually be a g= ood > issue for them to tackle as part of learning about GCC. So if you want to > set it aside, I can have someone poking at it fairly soon. Seem slike I've spent way too much time on this than warranted so might as = well complete it :-)=