From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id ADA483858D28; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:34:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ADA483858D28
From: "vineetg at rivosinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106602] New: riscv: suboptimal codegen for shift left,
 right, left
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:34:25 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vineetg at rivosinc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc
 target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-106602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 20:34:25 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106602

            Bug ID: 106602
           Summary: riscv: suboptimal codegen for shift left, right, left
           Product: gcc
           Version: 13.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: vineetg at rivosinc dot com
                CC: christophm30 at gmail dot com, kito at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

This came up when investigating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106545. The test to supposed=
ly
induce the peephole doesn't, but generates far inferior code.

unsigned long foo2(unsigned long a)
{
        return (unsigned long)(unsigned int)a << 6;
}

-march=3Drv64gc -O2   # no bitmanip

foo2:
        li      a5,1
        slli    a5,a5,38
        addi    a5,a5,-64
        slli    a0,a0,6
        and     a0,a0,a5
        ret

llvm generates expected

foo:
        slli    a0, a0, 32
        srli    a0, a0, 26
        ret=