From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 21E353858D32; Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:08:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 21E353858D32
From: "slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106617] [13 Regression] gcc is very slow at
 ternary expressions,
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:08:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: compile-time-hog
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106617-4-QHnrk7dkqr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106617-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106617-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:08:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106617

--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I doubt this is a regression. I suspect if you compile the trunk with
> > --enable-checking=3Drelease you would see the same compile time as 12.
>=20
> I think both my gcc-12.1.0 and gcc-13.0.0 are compiled with the same opti=
ons
> (both are without --enable-checking=3D option). My unsubstantiated guess =
would
> be on recently added rules to fold & (or similar) which does not scale too
> well on long strings of ternary operators.

Oh, only now I realized snapshots have a different default compared to rele=
ases
proper. I'll add --enable-checking=3Drelease and re-test.=