public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/106652] [C++23] P1467 - Extended floating-point types and standard names Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:28:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106652-4-ezkmEx8swR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-106652-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106652 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 53559 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53559&action=edit gcc13-pr106652-lib.patch Some unfinished library changes. Unfortunately, we seem to have a major problem with glibc. <bits/floatn.h> included from <math.h> etc. on some arches does: # if __HAVE_FLOAT128 /* The type _Float128 exists only since GCC 7.0. */ # if !__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0) || defined __cplusplus typedef __float128 _Float128; # endif ... #endif or typedef long double _Float128; etc. I'm afraid we'll need to fixincludes that and change in glibc. The question is to what exactly. I think with the compiler patch _Float<N> are in C++ generally available as keyword but __STDCPP_FLOAT<N>_T__ that the libstdc++ patch is using is only defined for C++23. The F<N> or f<N> literal suffixes pedwarn before C++23 but bet not in system headers, so glibc then could use those for C++ always for __GNUC_PREREQ (13, 0)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-10 17:28 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-16 17:14 [Bug c++/106652] New: " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 14:27 ` [Bug c++/106652] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 14:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 16:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-24 17:35 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2022-08-25 12:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-25 12:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-25 14:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-09 9:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-09 18:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-10 10:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-10 10:22 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-10 17:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-09-10 17:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-10 18:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-09-27 6:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-18 9:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-10-19 9:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-19 9:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-28 22:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-12-09 15:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-21 15:57 ` igorkuo at meta dot ua 2023-08-22 14:15 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-08-22 14:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106652-4-ezkmEx8swR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).