From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9AF463858C83; Tue,  7 Feb 2023 15:06:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9AF463858C83
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675782414;
	bh=PlhJVc1QrNHeUecz/D5I0EfpA/a4+LGCNChvfLmDpc8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KaJz17HJjGCzOFuOnmRHhMwrcKvmZ0G2MrQOtWzjhXyqmpfAW7ZbiNVbOLh2pQuxV
	 FchPOSbOo/rlPxYiPosdWJy8Si4MMUOFY8j591UhvU5ChpF80fcyHUTgTodBbzMtiM
	 hIXMgnpK0Vz+ggTdv1xuCXmIaOvy1m5+iF7/Kwyk=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106656] [C++23] P2513 - char8_t Compatibility and
 Portability Fixes
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2023 15:06:54 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106656-4-prz0J6d5qC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106656-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106656

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dimitrij Mijoski from comment #3)
> The documentation for CLI flag -fchar8_t should be updated
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C_002b_002b-Dialect-Options.html .

Oh right, this is not an error anymore:
char ca[] =3D u8"xx";

I'll fix, thanks.

> Is there any chance that this fix gets backported because it is treated as
> defect report to C++20?

I wasn't really planning to do that.=