From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D4AF13858C41; Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:24:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D4AF13858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1692635042;
	bh=jbGFx9ph9Z4rbtN3XwCbbufSM29hH+bxBHhZx4NBfhM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=L5g8aBqEayPDo+oQ4BIAddsvgljI2T5P8kS/e65h6LgFs/X+W+I6k175Lt5bdTclT
	 y846yWlp+p+U13LF9Du/R8YnmJryUTmcNHGXE1LRM5t672ou3xXt1Lk4ZZCvQpvT0G
	 9N2HG7WFHmmqHlxYRL87jfqu6XI+hBasfrMFezQk=
From: "broonie at kernel dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106671] aarch64: BTI instruction are not inserted for
 cross-section direct calls
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 16:24:02 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: broonie at kernel dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106671-4-stQu7YiZO4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106671-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106671

--- Comment #18 from Mark Brown <broonie at kernel dot org> ---
It's section placement stuff that's triggering this. You will also be able =
to
build a larger kernel if you try, though I'm not sure that's practical.=