From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3D88C385828D; Wed,  5 Oct 2022 10:12:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3D88C385828D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664964758;
	bh=lE7NXrGSr+gynI2Y62Dhhm+MyzieOj8UkcCpF3PivIY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=EaC8c5iHWFBsy/eSFWzYBn9/ut5k+DCntLnhKG9Ug+jaDyjpUjYdizs49DPKCvelA
	 VYuoWFNOXyhO0k9tFBsj+WGGHwywADxBYBAiwnjqSTy/ykbxcjHUwFcNzIrj6coSyJ
	 /LCbbzf51bBOYUQax0rHI88u/1kj/pbx2apoTe+k=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106698] `-O2 -flto` cause linker warning
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 10:12:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-106698-4-h8qDgsHBEn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106698

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2022-10-05
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I suspect the diagnostic code does not handle negative lower bounds arrays
> correctly.

Yes, see https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-August/599820.html=