From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E86F838582BE; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:44:22 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E86F838582BE DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1661327062; bh=poxXieXVpMdrgW2M1B/Cb2JXX8Y6RphAYmEdwejtw8w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CycEFUGChLFnkKWmsl3A1rodnf/RoQO6FH0jglQ2mPEYqLfAWeHFGCz6IpwOniX+f G9y5JX1ASVHTaxyGJ/NzqHXeSfRv2tT0ZYPwbdxWqfck1WxbzIOCPWxALeyY33IrlT LecSdTYDNxpAUIOvVbqDZY/VrIJeQAVKo7AJpJAc= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/106723] Unreplaced mode/code attributes in aarch64/arm backends Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:44:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106723 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- I think better would be to error out (or just warn) if we see a valid mode/= code attribute which doesn't handle the corresponding mode/code. For the PR106721, that would diagnose all but the last issue where there wa= s a typo, but that one is hard to distinguish from or etc. appearin= g in comments or perhaps assembly syntax on some targets.=