public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106736] [13 Regression] ICE in gen_movxo, at config/rs6000/mma.md:333
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 12:01:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-106736-4-u7g2LSkySM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-106736-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106736

--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> I wonder if we want to support types __vector_quad and __vector_pair without
> MMA support (or supposed to be fixed with Power10 later). If no, we need to
> guard register_builtin_type under TARGET_MMA (TARGET_POWER10 later) for
> those types. If yes, we may need to revisit its supports.

No, the __vector_quad and __vector_pair types should only be used for MMA
support.  That's not to say in the future that some other different types might
produce XOmode and OOmode usage.  So basically, the "types" are limited to MMA,
but the opaque modes are not limited to MMA.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-25 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-25  5:55 [Bug target/106736] New: " asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-08-25  5:57 ` [Bug target/106736] " asolokha at gmx dot com
2022-08-25  8:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-25  9:21 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-25 12:01 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-08-26 11:33 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-26 18:51 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-26 19:06 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-27 13:43 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-31  2:42 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-31 18:46 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-31 19:34 ` bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-08-31 21:00 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-09-07  6:51 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-19  7:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-21  3:07 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-12-27 19:33 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2023-01-03  2:01 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-03  6:56 ` asolokha at gmx dot com
2023-01-03  7:08 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-05  5:30 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-05  5:32 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-05  5:33 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-05  5:36 ` linkw at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-106736-4-u7g2LSkySM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).