From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EE8FD385021B; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:16:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EE8FD385021B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661544996;
	bh=4YxaX69dI0/f3MI6VjlXyzHihVfWr5YBuHQUYpL5Jos=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=puDLNJspMsePbBQg+j+DTDQupqV1ag6TFTXkz6j7L53eTZO5qjVt+0syUseUg7TES
	 O+TBnAMSb9D7o+9dRSdb8jpArITlhBD0RqFktFoMwlT6J/BXrZOeJLq6coGAJApSna
	 6Tg+7hH1FnGghrN9iW3aHkkUhksISlDonR4V5MEg=
From: "david.faust at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/106745] segfault in bpf_core_get_sou_member_index
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:16:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: david.faust at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106745-4-QIJpbmv4DY@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106745-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106745-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106745

David Faust <david.faust at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |david.faust at oracle dot =
com

--- Comment #1 from David Faust <david.faust at oracle dot com> ---
Thanks, I've reproduced the failure and found the issue.
The code which generates the CO-RE relocations isn't correctly handling
anonymous inner struct/union decls. So for example:
struct core_reloc_flavors___weird {
 struct {
  int b;
 };

 union {
  int a;
  int c;
 };
};

Asking to generate a CO-RE relo for access to a, b or c here will trigger t=
he
SEGV. Working on a fix.=