From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5B2F8385781F; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:01:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5B2F8385781F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661536912;
	bh=uACfjxtjjpKM+tgqD8m7AVxyNCg29SBEnDN+6BwymiQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DrC6KR3y0HDosdDy6Q8iQ06i0uA/nwUvuUUqXhEzdHy1rALluAw8bn7SidOarNjVT
	 iaIIOhBkGINUFzNnwML48JKz2hXPIqdxDDR0rZe7cw0O4yGh0OKBnPLOAdZHPHISXD
	 46n0CEtLWZFRdYrPQOG7jUiCmDrFmp5sD0rXDRMo=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106753] Give -Wunused-value warning for user-defined
 literal expressions with discarded result
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 18:01:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106753-4-XXmzgUEssH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106753-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106753

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But it seems reasonable that they should write:

(void) 123_disgusting;

to silence a warning if they're really creating a literal just for its side
effects.=