public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/106765] [12/13 Regression] ICE (invalid code) in tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.cc since r12-7222-g3f10e0d50b5e3b3f Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:03:19 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-106765-4-zKMqVn92tc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-106765-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106765 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd0c9d9e706adaeea0d96152daade0a6819a8715 commit r13-4143-gbd0c9d9e706adaeea0d96152daade0a6819a8715 Author: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com> Date: Thu Nov 17 22:08:07 2022 +0000 Fix PRs 106764, 106765, and 107307, all ICE after invalid re-declaration The problem here is the gimplifier returns GS_ERROR but in some cases we don't check that soon enough and try to do other work which could crash. So the fix in these two cases is to return GS_ERROR early if the gimplify_* functions had return GS_ERROR. OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions. Thanks, Andrew Pinski gcc/ChangeLog: PR c/106764 PR c/106765 PR c/107307 * gimplify.cc (gimplify_compound_lval): Return GS_ERROR if gimplify_expr had return GS_ERROR. (gimplify_call_expr): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c/106764 PR c/106765 PR c/107307 * gcc.dg/redecl-19.c: New test. * gcc.dg/redecl-20.c: New test. * gcc.dg/redecl-21.c: New test.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-18 17:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-08-28 15:15 [Bug c/106765] New: ICE (invalid code) in tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.cc k.even-mendoza at imperial dot ac.uk 2022-08-28 15:38 ` [Bug c/106765] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-29 13:39 ` [Bug c/106765] [12/13 Regression] ICE (invalid code) in tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in create_tmp_from_val, at gimplify.cc since r12-7222-g3f10e0d50b5e3b3f marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-08-29 14:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-15 19:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-11-18 17:03 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2022-11-18 17:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-106765-4-zKMqVn92tc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).