From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 51FC23858C74; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:23:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 51FC23858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663683832;
	bh=lmuxk1EXcm+nUayzCFeQhOhVyQX67HIFx+lSE6FODDk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=aIogttrUZKq1hiSFhR8SmKfLVeJ4wl8X051BZn2KHLbtNDJ5Qwhk8E3GMYRqyG5pU
	 vXy+TL5EALYhjLczlVxfcJCh5ddWKbYwa7NI2/FgRjkh+VJ+gp2nHRAmjbWkhMvjgE
	 vuYAxRi7xcCDjC2QeDKKqiT0hJDNdPY0ViovZIAA=
From: "valera.mironow at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool
 if used platform wait
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:23:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: valera.mironow at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106772-4-4Fl6Ljgbyo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106772

--- Comment #8 from Mkkt Bkkt <valera.mironow at gmail dot com> ---
> I have every confidence that Lewis knows how to bring a paper for a 'ligh=
tweight manual reset event' to SG1, I suspect it will be well received when=
 he does.

So at least before C++26 I and any other developer that known notify not ca=
lled
on non-waiting atomic should use ifdefs for linux/windows/mac etc syscalls?=