From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id ED2EA3858D28; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 22:00:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org ED2EA3858D28
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1664402454;
	bh=pv7l12qP4ltahT5vhqLkR4uQzZBwLEQDnqXHWHxjoNY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RsL8SBIJip05kJ5PwXYLLxwVUbvblom5fvuf8XMR/LUOx/6/5CyASrCyHKhGfj98G
	 5SMH2qC7AcBZRiTK3HHhfMKBkZXd1qw+VFEJODzYLR4p06+XJct2n5qW1Rpyv2LSDz
	 JGz/FNlICI1YcFGi5rsdsFWl7PioZN5spryvLcdg=
From: "valera.mironow at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool
 if used platform wait
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 22:00:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: valera.mironow at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106772-4-dji1HxhotH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106772

--- Comment #18 from Mkkt Bkkt <valera.mironow at gmail dot com> ---
Thanks for provide source of your benchmarks!

Can you also provide some example of usage atomic::notify where this
optimization is needed?

If it exists I think you right and it is necessary.=