From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 469C13857C42; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:27:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 469C13857C42
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663684079;
	bh=6PJsV7+Kd2ncnrbf7Ouql4dZgvOIrYx4nY3hxMI7v/4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=GJ9y5SYjPvK3fJ+IzNS/3RHyCp4hB4uQ+TXU/cHuVJqh8AMXpPbDx4/NOkgEkG+Cd
	 2XrLzt8MCgEwax0oQ1ci0VYlmV5bWNGxUM08wV7uhOYXaOfmrDA4QayZRsI0M+twSC
	 qCrWuEOeIWNfJZx/jVGlKmQuv1gSMqAEjmVdKI7c=
From: "valera.mironow at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool
 if used platform wait
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:27:42 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: valera.mironow at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106772-4-lmscSS77RM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106772

--- Comment #9 from Mkkt Bkkt <valera.mironow at gmail dot com> ---
Why do you think you smarter than msvc stl, libc++, boost::atomic developer=
s?

Maybe it's about your "I"?=