From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id AD5FC3858C74; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:40:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AD5FC3858C74
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663684829;
	bh=vXJTMLoRuGLFEI6K1mey6YsKX/8vgu8mHxlYmZU0Y1E=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SWeZIaUo6BRT0X01RZPZo/YKO+6ox4a3oUqJQ06DrnYQib3nU9Zl+FluM7HTkrEOv
	 7EZ7YypBrw8BHZgURBQc1bMwU0WSc055k37GRlkU6pSHBcKGZ+EgRS4cvVZP5mg8xs
	 7CwV9CTYLcRCWP9Q0N7u5PtxYVD0CA2e5rnMpbBM=
From: "rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/106772] atomic<T>::wait shouldn't touch waiter pool
 if used platform wait
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 14:40:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106772-4-z7muXMKP2n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106772-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106772

--- Comment #11 from Thomas Rodgers <rodgertq at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mkkt Bkkt from comment #9)
> Why do you think you smarter than msvc stl, libc++, boost::atomic develop=
ers?
>=20
> Maybe it's about your "I"?

I should ignore this (see jwakely's response), but -

I very much don't think I am smarter than the person (ogiroux@apple.com) who
implemented libc++'s implementation. There are minor difference between
libstc++'s details and libc++'s but in this regard,in particular, they beha=
ve
the same.=