From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2AFA43825BC6; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:50:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2AFA43825BC6 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1661903401; bh=w2m7XYGQN08u2z6kH/r07tAY8oihDEK5aD+5D9uoyB4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=o+/gd4XiGngBmW9TFeDIcSBxk1FeUV0rjctv+tw5Eu0lLZXIJkEFtBZxCFZ+7PZ7H f4ZyL+JJ7BUvwdg+QcjANsuAeaQtG6UNxnHvV1BZszbcNwVkIPimnP9Zn+nF8sf8k5 jlNicHw0d9DR8Z4M6BTvIl0xz0fny+duFCByKS/Q= From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/106774] warning about comparison to true/false Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:50:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106774 Eric Gallager changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.o= rg --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > that's more coding style though? Yeah I personally prefer the more explicit way of writing it with both oper= ands myself=