From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2AFA43825BC6; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:50:01 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2AFA43825BC6
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1661903401;
	bh=w2m7XYGQN08u2z6kH/r07tAY8oihDEK5aD+5D9uoyB4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=o+/gd4XiGngBmW9TFeDIcSBxk1FeUV0rjctv+tw5Eu0lLZXIJkEFtBZxCFZ+7PZ7H
	 f4ZyL+JJ7BUvwdg+QcjANsuAeaQtG6UNxnHvV1BZszbcNwVkIPimnP9Zn+nF8sf8k5
	 jlNicHw0d9DR8Z4M6BTvIl0xz0fny+duFCByKS/Q=
From: "egallager at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/106774] warning about comparison to true/false
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 23:50:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-106774-4-FEiushS8uJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106774-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106774

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> that's more coding style though?

Yeah I personally prefer the more explicit way of writing it with both oper=
ands
myself=