public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/106800] New: Expose more vector extensions in C @ 2022-09-01 9:08 piannetta at kalrayinc dot com 2022-09-01 9:18 ` [Bug c/106800] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: piannetta at kalrayinc dot com @ 2022-09-01 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106800 Bug ID: 106800 Summary: Expose more vector extensions in C Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: piannetta at kalrayinc dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, This is a follow-up of PR54427. Since gcc-4.9.4, C++ handles logical operators as well as the ternary operator on vectors but C does not. It would be nice to have a uniform behavior regarding the handling of those operators in C and C++. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/106800] Expose more vector extensions in C 2022-09-01 9:08 [Bug c/106800] New: Expose more vector extensions in C piannetta at kalrayinc dot com @ 2022-09-01 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-17 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-18 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-09-01 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106800 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2022-09-01 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/106800] Expose more vector extensions in C 2022-09-01 9:08 [Bug c/106800] New: Expose more vector extensions in C piannetta at kalrayinc dot com 2022-09-01 9:18 ` [Bug c/106800] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-17 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-18 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-17 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106800 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I have something in the works. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/106800] Expose more vector extensions in C 2022-09-01 9:08 [Bug c/106800] New: Expose more vector extensions in C piannetta at kalrayinc dot com 2022-09-01 9:18 ` [Bug c/106800] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-17 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-18 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-18 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106800 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 58699 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58699&action=edit patches in progress I've come up with this sofar, it's a bit difficult to navigate the current behavior wrt. truthvalue conversion and I am not too happy with the required "hacks". A C FE expert might provide guidance. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-07-18 7:22 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2022-09-01 9:08 [Bug c/106800] New: Expose more vector extensions in C piannetta at kalrayinc dot com 2022-09-01 9:18 ` [Bug c/106800] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-17 13:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-18 7:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).