From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 540A2385828D; Sat, 17 Sep 2022 02:16:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 540A2385828D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663380984; bh=5XX5/rha5l7ONAU/pRqBEH4ITG1wJlyNHbeMKq3LOY4=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RwnZ6WY3Kv4HwOV/SKz668N8ZhwcZcjy9q0DS8qKMLry0tCEYZwY5TJ45dvNPE3ph +2AGyxU8SjOdhHseFonNhqNI8JToVaEbAlfV5UOHY/BBauiHDL00tNSAJeLkN4lA4T ZS6C/DGJ5ZCuvjhsU0dVwPhKInzHaSTI7r5PfDQY= From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/106832] Missing powerpc64le-linux support for D Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 02:16:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106832 --- Comment #22 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #21) > For the record, this is what I'm testing with: So we get farther, but ICE again at: /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-lang-D/libphobos/src/std/math/exponentia= l.d:1104:9: error: static assert: "Not implemented for this architecture" 1104 | static assert(0, "Not implemented for this architecture"); | ^ /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-lang-D/libphobos/src/std/math/exponentia= l.d:981:19: note: instantiated from here: =E2=80=98expImpl!real=E2=80=99 981 | return expImpl(x); | ^ Looking at expImpl(), it has implementations for all of the float types exc= ept for IBM128. Maybe just need to add support for that???=