From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 64E7038AA258; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:35:33 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 64E7038AA258
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1663353333;
	bh=RqKtP2bGFBvanyz09L78ybxg6aOde83X3CBov0knXc0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JY0/nGkJKa3m7V8BIKUWGoizn14ACdiyoBy1utEX+UswTeBSCwQRZ7VsZ6Rdua4gD
	 1Le2NL4rrLBwh5qYXgke+owUk7Y+inWwHzlrQCSTh2dIccC2sQPVEMSD4blKf4gYJO
	 diKcG50s0Ip7WlLapWi6zxw97qOYtgl/sCt2/y8A=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/106832] Missing powerpc64le-linux support for D
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:35:33 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: d
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-106832-4-mkV8Aj5oJy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106832-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106832

--- Comment #19 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #17)
> Bah, you are correct.  I forgot I needed to add an explicit configure opt=
ion
> to get the IEEE128 default.  I'll kick it off again!  Thanks!

Ok, my Fedora36 (ie, a default IEEE128 system) bootstrap using
--with-long-double-format=3Dieee (and LIBDRUNTIME_ONLY=3Dyes removed) compl=
eted
with no errors and this is my gdc testsuite results, which looks pretty goo=
d to
me (ie, vast majority of gdc tests pass).  I can look into the few errors h=
ere,
but after I look into the IBM128 default system build issue.

                =3D=3D=3D gdc tests =3D=3D=3D


Running target unix
FAIL: gdc.dg/Wbuiltin_declaration_mismatch1.d    (test for warnings, line 1=
0)
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O0  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O0 -g  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O1  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O1 -g  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O2  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O2 -g  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O3  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -Os  execution test
FAIL: gdc.dg/torture/gdc309.d   -Os -g  execution test
UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/constfold.d   compilation failed to produce
executable
UNRESOLVED: gdc.test/runnable/constfold.d -shared-libphobos   compilation
failed to produce executable
FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/xtest46.d   execution test
FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/xtest46.d -shared-libphobos   execution test
FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/xtest46_gc.d   execution test
FAIL: gdc.test/runnable/xtest46_gc.d -shared-libphobos   execution test

                =3D=3D=3D gdc Summary =3D=3D=3D

# of expected passes            11442
# of unexpected failures        15
# of unresolved testcases       2
# of unsupported tests          442
/home/bergner/gcc/build/gcc-fsf-master-lang-D/gcc/gdc  version 13.0.0 20220=
916
(experimental) (GCC)=