From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 792E538582AD; Tue, 6 Sep 2022 15:23:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 792E538582AD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1662477813; bh=wPjFD4K1dL32G/r+cKzifTN7pUn4/7o0m2Lv1a/rUyc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jQHmsmWOWvr2544wGRMUoNOlMr8+kxgUbtdeP72JZzcuV6MwkWUojp4tK3BsNtWXQ CL4aIDkJvf/s3hTo8KuBKrApc+7R8113o2PjNb1vjl05odkok7n70dm/VSKAK+uxPV Q0XQmn0Ph/JxR/8j+estN7CpvWcHCJI0WJPfPxic= From: "dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug analyzer/106845] [13 Regression] ICE in exceeds_p, at analyzer/store.cc:464 since r13-2029-g7e3b45befdbbf1a1 Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2022 15:23:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106845 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Tim Lange from comment #3) > It seems to me that the implementations of byte_range/bit_range > get_last_byte_offset () already assume that m_size_in_bytes should be > greater than zero. So I think the first one should the preferred fix. Sounds right to me; do you want to assign yourself this one?=