From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0BAB93858D33; Thu, 2 Mar 2023 20:51:30 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0BAB93858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1677790290; bh=4vWT+jgmdUW5p0YiCeScsuvkyEddMDAHoOZyFZ86kd0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TdzlbPVVvgZ62okBbqD4a3vpHOpo6JRIwdl7UY5Fs+BBOdbEfjV8XD1Z/JYNtj8lK dIB7ecIZE4lvSnnFKMEIR5MmLfC74e0A+EJEMRQVVT02iJbfp1zdxXVSjHmRqnaPqb zT43e2Q2f6DLyG+K01ha42VmNgHyb8/4xe2K5uqY= From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2023 20:51:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106856 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot g= nu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #4) > - testcase pr69398.f90 ICE's - as expected, see comment in new testcase > class_75.f90. Shall we mark this one as XFAIL for the time being and > reopen pr69398? This intermediate regression appears to result from an invalid double-free. I plan to package an updated patch for submission.=