From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2BAE538A8162; Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:04:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2BAE538A8162 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1663002264; bh=iQAh8VU6DMISeZ5k7iYZhEgKz2mYnx/H/lPIoZknEc0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lOOIpSvdYhx12DHJ9/8lT4Q95PdDNOTJYBHtmR0ZniIbegoJKH1Oa4UyEniyp1cva H9l79TjaV3gQlHLE/QJnOTONSZQkhLUQ5orOJ8tuGHsENProiYMb9Vjl2VicVBEkkH M9wlDyc26v2p30DLZw9L4kPL/oHYSZ5U6DRmCLNE= From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106868] [12/13 Regression] Bogus -Wdangling-pointer warning with -O1 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 17:04:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106868 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) ... Actually, scratch that, sorry. Richard is right that the false positive is= due to a bug in the warning code. The following patch resolves it: diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc index 04aa849a4b1..79093b46906 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc @@ -4467,6 +4467,7 @@ pass_waccess::gimple_call_return_arg_ref (gcall *call) { access_ref aref; if (m_ptr_qry.get_ref (arg, call, &aref, 0) + && aref.deref < 0 && DECL_P (aref.ref)) return aref.ref; }=