From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 489C53858406; Thu,  8 Sep 2022 11:12:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 489C53858406
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1662635549;
	bh=/nOHAzRXRgS8/8qKhOsyoIpublmJ0wJ3fcTrUlyXvTQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UBDYAxY8GdUjpVP+Gqpt5FNVxtnRIgJpb8qGd0ShzvkA7Fk3kwLkSXMqHR7B+Gkqv
	 3NJeF4Wsw/JSt9Zlav5BtDGeKClh7uIM+oV7FMqj9sxt0xeEKoA72Dcq23ig6OUBWV
	 jFX5karsGh2RPorHMuHx0e6ncxvVR3EgHz9ATmes=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/106881] [13 Regression] ice in
 init_from_control_deps, at gimple-predicate-analysis.cc:1740 since
 r13-2500-g0a4a2667dc115ca7
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2022 11:12:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-106881-4-WUy5GiBQdJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-106881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-106881-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D106881

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Interesting, we have

<bb 10> [count: 0]:
resx 3

<bb 11> [count: 0]:
<L10>:
goto <bb 13>; [100.00%]

with an EH edge from 10 to 11.  That looks like a missed optimization,
eliding the RESX and turning the EH edge into a fallthru.=